Governance & Voting
What if your community could vote on what you build next? Governance opens up new possibilities for builder-community collaboration.
Community-Driven Development
Today, builders decide what to build and when. That works, but what if there was a better way? What if your most committed supporters could help shape your roadmap?
Token-based governance lets holders vote on proposals. Feature priorities. Design decisions. Partnership opportunities. The community becomes an active participant in the project's direction.
Potential Governance Areas
- •Feature prioritization
- •Design decisions
- •Partnership approvals
- •Treasury allocations
- •Community initiatives
Benefits
- Build what users actually want
- Increase community engagement
- Distribute decision-making
- Create deeper ownership
- Surface community wisdom
How It Could Work
Imagine this: You're a builder deciding between three features for your next sprint. Instead of guessing, you create a proposal. Token holders vote. The winning feature gets built. Your community feels heard. You build something people actually want.
Voting power could be weighted by token holdings, time held, or contribution history. The details matter, and we're thinking carefully about how to make governance fair and effective.
Builder Retains Control
Governance doesn't mean giving up control. Builders can choose what to put to vote and what to decide themselves. The goal is to give communities a voice, not to create design-by-committee chaos. Smart governance enhances building; it doesn't replace builder judgment.