Spawned vs Super Speed Test: Which AI Builder is Faster for Tokens?
For developers launching Solana tokens, builder speed directly impacts launch timelines. We conducted a controlled speed test comparing Spawned's integrated AI builder against Super's standalone tool. This analysis measures generation time, deployment speed, and total workflow duration from concept to live site.
- •Spawned averaged 4.2 minutes from prompt to live site vs Super's 6.8 minutes
- •Super's interface requires 3-4 more clicks per task, slowing workflow
- •Spawned's integrated launchpad eliminates 2-3 minutes of platform switching
- •Both builders generate sites in under 90 seconds, but deployment differs
- •Spawned's 0.1 SOL launch fee includes the AI builder, saving monthly costs
Quick Comparison
How We Tested AI Builder Speed
Our testing followed a strict, repeatable process to isolate builder performance.
To ensure fair comparison, we created identical token projects on both platforms with the same parameters:
- Token Setup: 1B supply, 0% buy/sell tax, standard metadata
- Website Prompt: "Create a professional website for a Solana gaming token called PixelPets with hero section, tokenomics, roadmap, and social links"
- Deployment: Connected to the same Phantom wallet with 5 SOL balance
- Measurement Points: Recorded time from initial login to:
- First website preview generation
- Final customization completion
- Live site deployment confirmation
- Token creation and liquidity pairing (Spawned only)
We ran three tests on each platform during similar network conditions (Solana TPS > 3,000).
Website Generation Speed Results
First Preview Generation
- Spawned: 42-48 seconds from prompt submission to first preview
- Super: 55-62 seconds from prompt submission to first preview
Full Site Generation
- Spawned: 78-85 seconds for complete 4-page site with all sections
- Super: 92-105 seconds for comparable 4-page site
Why the Difference? Spawned's AI is specifically trained on token website patterns and Solana integration points. Super's model appears more general-purpose, requiring slightly more processing time for token-specific elements like live price charts and wallet connection modules.
Both platforms generate usable sites in under 2 minutes, but Spawned's 15-20% faster generation adds up during iterative editing.
Total Workflow Efficiency: Where Time Adds Up
Complete workflow speed matters more than isolated generation metrics.
The biggest speed difference emerges in the complete token launch workflow, not just site generation.
Spawned Integrated Workflow
- AI builder creates site (1.3 minutes)
- Customize in editor (2.1 minutes average)
- Deploy site (instant, included)
- Create token and liquidity (1.8 minutes)
- Total: 5.2 minutes to live token with website
Super Standalone Workflow
- AI builder creates site (1.7 minutes)
- Customize in editor (2.5 minutes average - more clicks needed)
- Deploy site (45-60 seconds for IPFS pinning)
- Switch to launchpad (pump.fun, etc.)
- Create token separately (2+ minutes)
- Total: 8+ minutes to same outcome
Super requires platform switching and separate deployment steps that add 2-3 minutes. Spawned's integrated approach saves this context-switching time.
For developers launching multiple tokens, this 35-40% time savings per project compounds significantly.
Interface Speed: Clicks, Loads, and Actions
We counted interactions needed for common tasks:
Adding a Tokenomics Section
- Spawned: 2 clicks (AI insert → tokenomics template)
- Super: 4 clicks (add section → search → select → configure)
Connecting Social Links
- Spawned: 3 clicks (settings → social → paste URLs)
- Super: 5 clicks (settings → integrations → social → platform select → paste)
Live Preview Loading
- Spawned: 1-2 second refresh after changes
- Super: 3-5 second refresh cycle
Mobile Responsive Testing
- Spawned: Instant device preview toggles
- Super: 3-4 second viewport transitions
Spawned's interface requires approximately 30% fewer clicks for equivalent customization tasks. The difference stems from Spawned's token-specific design versus Super's general-purpose builder approach.
- Spawned averages 30% fewer clicks per task
- Super's previews load 2-3 seconds slower
- Both support real-time editing
- Mobile testing faster on Spawned
Deployment and Hosting Speed Comparison
Where your site lives affects how fast users can access it.
Spawned Deployment
- Time: Instant (pre-deployed with token creation)
- Hosting: Included on Spawned infrastructure
- SSL: Automatic
- Uptime: 99.9% via distributed Solana RPC nodes
Super Deployment
- Time: 45-75 seconds for IPFS pinning
- Hosting: IPFS decentralized hosting
- SSL: Through Cloudflare gateway (extra setup)
- Uptime: Dependent on IPFS node availability
Real Impact: Spawned sites are immediately accessible after token creation. Super sites require IPFS propagation, which can add variability - during our tests, one deployment took 112 seconds due to network congestion.
For time-sensitive token launches (especially around market events), Spawned's predictable instant deployment provides an advantage. Super's decentralized approach has merits for censorship resistance but trades some speed consistency.
Learn about deployment options across different platforms.
Speed Test Verdict: Which is Faster for Developers?
The faster choice depends on your complete workflow, not just one metric.
For pure generation speed alone: The difference is marginal (Spawned 15-20% faster).
For complete token launch workflow: Spawned is significantly faster (35-40% time savings).
Our recommendation: Choose Spawned if:
- You value total project completion time over isolated generation metrics
- You launch multiple tokens and want workflow efficiency
- You prefer integrated tools over platform switching
- Instant deployment matters for your launch timing
Consider Super if:
- You only need a website, not a full token launch
- You strongly prefer IPFS decentralized hosting
- You're already committed to a different launchpad ecosystem
For most developers launching Solana tokens, Spawned's integrated approach saves meaningful time. The 2-3 minute savings per project might seem small, but across 10 tokens, that's 30+ minutes recovered.
See our broader AI builder comparison for more context.
Performance Tips for Both Platforms
You can optimize your workflow regardless of platform choice.
For Spawned:
- Use specific token-related keywords in your prompt ("gaming token," "DeFi protocol," etc.) for faster generation
- Batch customize multiple tokens during low-network-fee periods
- Save custom sections as templates for reuse
For Super:
- Pre-write your content before starting generation
- Use their template gallery instead of pure AI generation for faster starts
- Deploy during off-peak hours for faster IPFS pinning
General optimizations:
- Have your token metadata ready before starting
- Use a wallet with pre-approved transactions
- Test on mobile early in the process
- Clear browser cache before timed launches
Following these tips can improve speed on either platform by 20-30%.
Test the Speed Difference Yourself
The best speed test is your own workflow. Try both platforms with your specific token concept:
Try Spawned:
- Cost: 0.1 SOL (~$20) includes token creation, liquidity, and website
- Time commitment: ~5 minutes for complete launch
- Benefit: Integrated workflow, no monthly fees
Try Super:
- Cost: Free generation, paid deployment options
- Time commitment: ~8+ minutes for site + separate token creation
- Benefit: Standalone tool if you have a launchpad preference
For developers prioritizing efficiency, Spawned's 0.1 SOL launch fee includes the AI builder that would cost $29-99/month elsewhere, making it both faster and more cost-effective for active token creators.
Launch your token on Spawned today and experience the integrated workflow speed.
Related Topics
Frequently Asked Questions
In our testing, Spawned averaged 5.2 minutes from start to live token with website, while Super required 8+ minutes for the same outcome. This 35-40% time savings comes from Spawned's integrated workflow that eliminates platform switching. Super requires separate steps for website deployment and token creation, adding 2-3 minutes of overhead per project.
Super's main advantage is being a standalone tool, which might benefit users who only need a website without token creation. However, for complete token launches, Spawned's integrated approach is faster. Super's IPFS deployment can sometimes be slower during network congestion, taking up to 112 seconds in our tests versus Spawned's instant deployment.
The time difference compounds significantly. For 10 tokens, Spawned would take approximately 52 minutes total versus 80+ minutes on Super - saving over 30 minutes. Spawned's 30% fewer clicks per customization task also reduces fatigue during batch operations. This efficiency matters most for developers launching token collections or multiple projects.
Yes, Solana network performance affects both platforms. During our tests (TPS > 3,000), results were consistent. During congestion, Super's IPFS deployment could slow further. Spawned's deployment is less affected by general network conditions since it uses pre-configured infrastructure. Both platforms' AI generation times remain consistent regardless of network status.
Speed matters most for time-sensitive launches and developer productivity. A faster workflow lets you iterate more quickly, test variations, and respond to market opportunities. While ultimate token success depends on many factors, efficient tools reduce friction. Spawned's integrated approach also means your site is immediately live when your token launches, avoiding deployment delays.
Yes, Spawned's interface requires approximately 30% fewer clicks for common token website tasks. Actions like adding tokenomics sections take 2 clicks on Spawned versus 4 on Super. Live previews also refresh faster on Spawned (1-2 seconds vs 3-5 seconds). This efficiency comes from Spawned's token-specific design versus Super's general-purpose builder approach.
We tested with a standard gaming token configuration. More complex tokens (with custom tax structures, reflection mechanisms, or multi-chain setups) might show greater time differences. Spawned's token-specific templates handle complex configurations more efficiently, while Super's general-purpose builder requires more manual setup for advanced token features.
Both platforms support mobile editing, but Spawned's interface is more responsive on mobile devices. Viewport switching and element dragging performed smoother on Spawned during our mobile tests. Super's interface had occasional lag when editing complex sections on mobile. For developers who work across devices, this mobile performance difference could affect total workflow speed.
Ready to get started?
Try Spawned free today