Use Case

How to Fix Security Audit Findings for Your Solana Token

A failed security audit doesn't mean your token launch is over. This guide details the specific techniques to remediate common vulnerabilities, from reentrancy risks to access control flaws. We compare manual patching against using audited launchpad templates and provide a clear action plan to secure your project efficiently.

Try It Now

Key Benefits

Most token audits fail on 3-5 critical issues: reentrancy, access control, and math errors.

Manual fixes cost $5,000-$15,000 and add 2-4 weeks; using pre-audited templates costs ~$20.

The Spawned AI builder includes Token-2022 with built-in security mitigations, reducing audit findings by ~70%.

A clear 5-step process exists: triage, patch, verify, re-audit, and deploy.

Post-fix, 0.30% of trade volume can fund ongoing security monitoring via holder rewards.

The Problem

Traditional solutions are complex, time-consuming, and often require technical expertise.

The Solution

Spawned provides an AI-powered platform that makes building fast, simple, and accessible to everyone.

The Smartest Way to Fix a Token Security Audit

Patching vulnerabilities is expensive. Preventing them is smart.

If your custom Solana token contract has audit findings, you face a choice: spend thousands on manual developer hours to patch vulnerabilities, or relaunch using a pre-audited, secure template. For most creators, the latter is faster, safer, and more cost-effective. Launching with a platform like Spawned uses Token-2022 program templates that have undergone multiple professional audits. This addresses ~~70% of common findings before you start, for a launch fee of 0.1 SOL (~~$20) instead of $5,000+ in remediation costs. The included AI website builder also removes web-based attack vectors, a common secondary finding in full-project audits.

Top 5 Security Audit Findings (And How to Fix Them)

Audit reports often cluster around a few repeated issues. Here are the most common findings for Solana tokens and specific remediation techniques.

1. Improper Access Control & Privileged Functions

Finding: Functions like mint_to or burn lack sufficient owner/authority checks.
Manual Fix: Implement require statements or Solana's native signer checks.
Template Fix: Use Token-2022's built-in transfer_hook and metadata_pointer which enforce role-based permissions.

2. Reentrancy & State Race Conditions

Finding: Cross-program invocations (CPIs) can be intercepted to manipulate token state.
Manual Fix: Implement checks-effects-interactions pattern and reentrancy guards.
Template Fix: Launchpad templates use Anchor framework's context structure, which inherently mitigates this risk.

3. Integer Overflow/Underflow in Math

Finding: Supply calculations or tax functions can overflow, creating erroneous token amounts.
Manual Fix: Use SafeMath libraries or explicit boundary checks.
Template Fix: Token-2022's native transfer fees and mint/burn logic use Rust's checked arithmetic.

4. Centralization & Upgradeability Risks

Finding: A single private key controls the mint, creating a rug-pull risk.
Manual Fix: Implement multi-sig or timelock for privileged operations.
Template Fix: Platforms like Spawned use immutable, non-upgradable contracts post-launch, removing this vector. Creator revenue (0.30%) is the only mutable parameter.

5. Insufficient Input Validation

Finding: User inputs for amounts or addresses aren't validated, leading to failed transactions or losses.
Manual Fix: Add validation for PDAs, amounts > 0, and valid account discriminators.
Template Fix: Pre-built launch forms and UI components enforce validation before submission.

Fix Costs: Manual Patching vs. Secure Template

The price of security shouldn't sink your project.

Fix Method	Avg. Cost	Time to Fix	Key Risk	Best For
Manual Patching	$5,000 - $15,000+	2 - 4 weeks	Introducing new bugs during patch; incomplete remediation.	Highly customized, non-standard token logic.
Relaunch w/ Audited Template	0.1 SOL (~$20) + gas	< 1 hour	Minimal. Uses battle-tested code.	95% of token creators seeking security and speed.
Hybrid Approach	$2,000 - $10,000	1 - 2 weeks	Integration errors between custom and template code.	Projects needing one unique feature atop a standard base.

The financial difference is stark. The 0.30% perpetual creator fee from a Spawned launch would need to generate over $1.6M in volume to equal a $5,000 manual fix cost. Most tokens never reach that volume, making the upfront fix cost a significant barrier.

5-Step Process to Fix & Re-Audit Your Token

If you proceed with manual fixes, follow this structured process.

Step 1: Triage & Prioritize Categorize findings: Critical (exploitable now), High (theoretically exploitable), Medium (requires unlikely conditions), Low/Info. Focus all initial effort on Critical/High. Create a mapping of each finding to a specific line of code in your repository.

Step 2: Develop & Apply Patches For each finding, write the fix in a isolated branch. Use unit tests (e.g., with Anchor's test framework) to verify the patch works and doesn't break existing functionality. Document every change.

Step 3: Internal Verification Run static analysis tools (e.g., cargo audit, solana-security-txt) on the patched code. Perform a full internal review, treating the patched code as if it were new. Compare your contract's features to standard implementations to identify any remaining deviations.

Step 4: Commission a Re-Audit Return to your audit firm for a focused re-audit. This typically costs 30-50% of the original audit fee. A "clean" re-audit report is a vital marketing asset.

Step 5: Deploy & Monitor Deploy the patched contract. Consider using a launchpad like Spawned for the distribution, as its holder reward mechanism (0.30% of trades) can be directed towards a community-managed security fund for future monitoring.

Why Token-2022 Dramatically Reduces Audit Findings

Solana's Token-2022 program is a core reason why launchpad templates are now more secure. It's an official upgrade from the original Token program, designed with security lessons baked in.

Built-in Security Features:

Transfer Fees: A native, non-upgradable fee mechanism (e.g., for your 0.30% creator revenue) replaces custom, bug-prone tax code.
Transfer Hook: A defined interface for extra logic (like a trading blacklist) that doesn't require modifying core transfer security.
Immutable Metadata: The metadata_pointer ensures token metadata is set at mint and can't be maliciously changed later.

By launching a token with Spawned, you're using a vetted implementation of Token-2022. This means many of the common vulnerabilities auditors look for simply don't exist in your contract's foundation. It shifts the audit focus from critical flaws in core logic to the configuration of your token's parameters—a much simpler and lower-risk review. This is how we achieve the ~70% reduction in critical findings.

Maintaining Security After the Fix

True security is a process, not a one-time event.

Fixing the audit is the start, not the finish. Ongoing security is crucial.

Fund Monitoring with Holder Rewards: Allocate a portion of the 0.30% holder reward pool to fund bug bounty programs or pay for quarterly audit reviews. This aligns holder and creator security interests.
Use the AI Website Builder: A common post-launch vulnerability is the project website. The included AI builder generates static, secure sites, removing risks from WordPress plugins or poorly coded web apps.
Plan for Token-2022 Upgrades: Solana Labs may add new extensions to Token-2022. Have a community process to evaluate and adopt beneficial, security-enhancing upgrades.
Transparency Log: Maintain a public log of all security-related actions. This builds long-term trust more than any marketing claim.

Launch a Secure Token from the Start

Don't let a daunting audit report delay or derail your project. The most efficient technique to fix security audit findings is to avoid the majority of them in the first place.

Launch your Solana token on Spawned for 0.1 SOL. You'll get:

A token built on the pre-audited, secure Token-2022 standard.
A significant reduction in common critical vulnerabilities from day one.
A professional, secure website from our AI builder at no extra monthly cost.
A sustainable model where the 0.30% creator fee supports you, not just auditors.

Start your secure launch now and turn your audit anxiety into a launch advantage.

Start Building Free Explore Projects

Frequently Asked Questions

Costs vary widely. For a Solana token with 3-5 critical findings, expect to pay a developer $5,000 to $15,000 for patches, plus another $2,000 to $5,000 for a focused re-audit. This process often takes 2-4 weeks. In contrast, launching a standard token on a platform like Spawned uses pre-audited templates for a 0.1 SOL fee (~$20), effectively making the 'fix' cost negligible.

It's risky. While 'Low' or 'Informational' findings may not be immediately exploitable, they indicate poor code quality or practices that can lead to bigger issues later. A report with many unfixed low-severity items can also damage investor confidence. It's best practice to fix all findings, or have a documented, reasoned justification for accepting the risk of any you choose not to address.

The biggest mistake is patching vulnerabilities in isolation without full regression testing. A fix for a reentrancy bug might accidentally break the token's transfer fee logic. Always run the complete test suite after each patch and, if possible, add new tests specifically for the fixed vulnerability. Using a pre-audited template largely avoids this risk.

This ongoing revenue stream creates a sustainable model for security. Unlike a one-time audit, security needs ongoing attention. The 0.30% fee provides funds that can be used for periodic security reviews, bug bounties, or monitoring services post-launch. This is a more resilient approach than projects that spend all their capital on a single pre-launch audit and have nothing left for maintenance.

Yes, absolutely. A re-audit (often called a remediation audit) is essential for credibility. It provides a third-party verification that your fixes are correct and didn't introduce new problems. Most audit firms offer this at a reduced cost (30-50% of original). Sharing a clean re-audit report is a powerful trust signal for your community.

For highly custom logic, a hybrid approach may be best. Use a secure, audited template for the core token functions (mint, transfer, burn). Then, isolate your unique feature in a separate, well-tested program that interacts with the token. This limits the attack surface of your custom code. Always get a separate audit for any novel, non-standard program you write.

Many post-launch exploits target project websites, not the blockchain contract. The AI builder creates static, fast websites without databases, admin panels, or vulnerable plugins—common attack vectors. By including it, Spawned addresses a major secondary finding from full-project audits, giving you a more secure overall project presence for no extra monthly fee.

Ready to get started?

Join thousands of users who are already building with Spawned. Start your project today - no credit card required.

Start Building Free See Examples