How to Avoid Poor Tokenomics: A Creator's Guide for Solana
Poor tokenomics is the leading cause of token failure, often leading to immediate price collapse and community loss. This guide shows crypto creators how to design sustainable token economics with proper supply, distribution, utility, and ongoing rewards. Learn the concrete mistakes to avoid and how to structure your token for long-term viability.
Try It NowKey Benefits
The Problem
Traditional solutions are complex, time-consuming, and often require technical expertise.
The Solution
Spawned provides an AI-powered platform that makes building fast, simple, and accessible to everyone.
What Exactly Is Poor Tokenomics?
It's more than just a big supply number.
Poor tokenomics refers to the structural economic flaws in a cryptocurrency's design that guarantee its failure. These aren't minor issues—they're fundamental mistakes in how the token's supply, distribution, and utility are planned. The most common result is immediate, massive sell pressure that collapses the price within hours or days of launch.
Think of tokenomics as the foundation of your project's house. A poor foundation means the entire structure is unstable, no matter how good the marketing or community looks. On Solana, where launching is fast and cheap, these mistakes are especially common and costly. Projects with poor tokenomics often see 80-90% of their value disappear in the first week, destroying creator credibility and making recovery nearly impossible.
Examples include: launching with 1 trillion tokens and no burn mechanism, giving 40% of supply to the team with no vesting, or creating a token with zero actual use beyond speculation.
7 Common Poor Tokenomics Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)
Here are the concrete errors creators make, with specific numbers and solutions.
- Massive, Undefined Supply: Launching with 1 billion or 1 trillion tokens 'just because.' This creates psychological price barriers and dilution. Fix: Start with a smaller, meaningful supply (e.g., 1 million to 100 million). Plan a transparent mint/burn schedule.
- Team/VC Dump Schedules: Allocating 30-50% to insiders with unlocks starting immediately at launch. This floods the market. Fix: Implement linear vesting over 12-24 months. Use a cliff period (e.g., 6 months with no tokens released).
- Zero Real Utility: The token only exists to be bought and sold. Fix: Define clear uses: governance voting, access to features, revenue sharing, or in-app currency. Learn about gaming token utility.
- Hyper-Inflationary Rewards: Printing unlimited tokens as 'rewards' or 'reflections' with no sink. Fix: Cap total supply or create strong burn mechanisms tied to platform usage.
- Poor Initial Distribution: 70% of tokens in the liquidity pool, making the chart easy to manipulate. Fix: Aim for a wider initial holder base via fair launch elements, airdrops, or phased sales.
- Ignoring Holder Incentives: No reason to hold beyond price speculation. Fix: Integrate ongoing rewards. For example, Spawned offers 0.30% of every trade to holders automatically via the Token-2022 standard.
- No Post-Launch Revenue Plan: The project makes no money after launch, killing development. Fix: Build in sustainable fees. A 1% perpetual fee on trades post-graduation funds ongoing work without harming initial launch.
How to Design Your Token Supply & Distribution: A 5-Step Plan
Follow this actionable framework to build a solid foundation.
Good Tokenomics vs. Poor Tokenomics: A Side-by-Side Look
| Aspect | Poor Tokenomics Example | Good Tokenomics Example |
|---|---|---|
| Total Supply | 1,000,000,000,000 (1 Trillion) with no rationale. | 10,000,000, with 2% annual inflation for rewards, capped at 20M. |
| Team Allocation | 40%, unlocked at launch. | 15%, with 12-month cliff and 24-month linear vesting. |
| Holder Incentive | "Number go up" is the only reason to hold. | 0.30% of every trade redistributed to holders automatically. |
| Post-Launch Model | No plan; hope the token price funds development. | 1% fee on all trades post-graduation funds the treasury. |
| Utility | "It's a meme coin" or vague promises. | Clear use: governance, in-game currency, access to premium features. |
The Outcome Difference: The poor example will likely face a massive sell-off from the team and early buyers immediately, crashing the price. The good example aligns long-term incentives, giving holders a reason to stay and the project a way to fund itself.
How Your Launch Platform Can Prevent Poor Tokenomics
The platform you choose to launch on can either enable bad habits or enforce good practices. Some launchpads focus only on the initial creation event, ignoring what happens after. This often leads to 'pump and dump' scenarios.
A better approach is a platform with economic structures designed for longevity. For instance, launching on Spawned includes built-in mechanisms that discourage poor tokenomics:
- Creator Revenue: 0.30% fee on every trade gives you ongoing income from day one, reducing the temptation to dump your own tokens for funds.
- Holder Rewards: 0.30% of every trade is automatically distributed to token holders. This is a direct, transparent utility that encourages holding.
- Graduation Path: Moving beyond the initial launchpad to a permanent contract includes a sustainable 1% fee model, ensuring the project has future resources.
- AI Website Builder: Including a professional site (saving $29-99/month) helps establish legitimacy and communicate your token's utility clearly from the start.
Choosing a platform that thinks about Step 2 (sustainability) as much as Step 1 (launch) is a major step in avoiding poor tokenomics. Compare launchpad features.
The Verdict: How to Avoid Poor Tokenomics
Avoiding poor tokenomics is non-negotiable for any serious creator. It requires upfront planning, transparency, and choosing tools that support sustainable economics.
Start with a clear plan for supply, distribution, and utility before you write a line of code. Use vesting schedules for insiders, create real reasons to hold your token, and ensure your project has a way to generate revenue post-launch. The small effort spent here has a massive return in trust and longevity.
For Solana creators, launching on a platform like Spawned provides a structural advantage. The built-in 0.30% creator revenue, 0.30% holder rewards, and clear path to a 1% perpetual fee model create a framework that naturally discourages the short-term, extractive practices that define poor tokenomics. The low 0.1 SOL launch fee allows you to invest your resources into building the project, not just launching it.
Ultimately, good tokenomics is about aligning incentives between you, your holders, and the long-term vision of your project.
Ready to Launch with Sustainable Tokenomics?
Don't let poor tokenomics be the reason your project fails. Design a token with a future.
Spawned provides the framework for sustainable token economics:
- Launch your Solana token with clear, built-in economic incentives.
- Earn 0.30% creator revenue from every trade from day one.
- Reward your holders automatically with 0.30% of every transaction.
- Get a professional AI-built website included to explain your token's utility.
- All for a 0.1 SOL launch fee.
Move beyond the pump. Build something that lasts.
Related Topics
Frequently Asked Questions
The most damaging mistake is a massive, unfair initial distribution. This typically means too many tokens going to the team or early investors without vesting, or too high a percentage locked in the initial liquidity pool. Both create immediate and predictable sell pressure that destroys price and trust. Always use vesting schedules for insiders and aim for a wide, fair initial distribution.
Holder rewards provide a continuous, passive income reason to hold the token beyond price speculation. A model like Spawned's 0.30% reward, distributed automatically to holders on every trade, directly counteracts sell pressure. Instead of holders asking 'why shouldn't I sell?', they have a tangible benefit to staying, which stabilizes the token and builds a loyal community. It turns the token from a speculative asset into an income-generating one.
It is extremely difficult and often requires a full token migration or relaunch, which damages credibility. Minor adjustments like implementing a burn mechanism or starting a staking reward program can help, but they cannot fix fundamental flaws like an oversupply or a team treasury that's already been dumped. It's far more effective to spend time designing good tokenomics before you launch. The 0.1 SOL launch fee on Spawned makes iterating on a testnet or revising plans before mainnet launch a low-cost option.
There's no perfect number, but supplies between 1 million and 100 million are common and psychologically manageable for new communities. A 10 million token supply at a $0.10 price is a $1 million Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV), which is a realistic starting goal for many projects. Avoid trillion or billion-supply memecoins unless that is your explicit, communicated brand. The key is that the supply number should make sense for your pricing goals and utility.
Ongoing fees, like a 1% perpetual fee after graduating from a launchpad, fund continuous development, marketing, and community initiatives. Without a revenue model, developers must either sell their token holdings (creating sell pressure) or abandon the project. A small, sustainable fee ensures the project can operate long-term without harming early investors. It aligns the project's success with the token's health.
Poor communication is a root cause of poor tokenomics. The AI website builder helps you create a professional site to clearly explain your token's supply, distribution, utility, and reward mechanisms to potential buyers. Transparency builds trust. A clear, official source of information prevents misunderstandings and FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) that often plague projects with opaque economics.
Ready to get started?
Join thousands of users who are already building with Spawned. Start your project today - no credit card required.