Comparison

Spawned vs Continue: AI Builder Speed Test Results

This is a direct performance comparison between the Spawned AI Builder and Continue's AI website generator for Solana tokens. We measured the complete workflow from prompt to live site, including blockchain transaction time. Speed impacts developer productivity and launch timing, making it a critical metric.

TL;DR

•Token Website Generation: Spawned averages 18 seconds from prompt to preview; Continue averages 32 seconds.
•Deployment to Solana: Spawned's built-in launchpad deploys contracts and mints tokens in ~45 seconds. Continue requires external contract deployment, adding 2+ minutes.
•End-to-End Time: To launch a token with a live site, Spawned's integrated flow takes ~1 minute. Continue's multi-step process takes 3+ minutes.

Quick Comparison

Token Website Generation: Spawned averages 18 seconds from prompt to preview; Continue averages 32 seconds.

Deployment to Solana: Spawned's built-in launchpad deploys contracts and mints tokens in ~45 seconds. Continue requires external contract deployment, adding 2+ minutes.

End-to-End Time: To launch a token with a live site, Spawned's integrated flow takes ~1 minute. Continue's multi-step process takes 3+ minutes.

How We Tested AI Builder Speed

We performed 10 timed runs for each platform under identical conditions to ensure a fair comparison. The test measured the complete journey for a developer: generating a token website from a text prompt, customizing it, and making it live. All tests were run on a standard developer setup on the Solana Devnet to isolate network variables.

Test Parameters:

Prompt: "Create a website for a Solana meme token called 'TestToken' with a dog mascot, a clear roadmap, and tokenomics."
Customization: Added a custom logo link and changed one color theme element.
Network: Solana Devnet (to avoid mainnet congestion).\n* Hardware: A standard laptop with no special optimizations.

The results show a clear difference in how each platform handles the complete process. For context on other AI builders, you can check our List of Best AI Builders for Tokens 2026.

AI Generation & Preview Speed

Spawned generates a preview nearly twice as fast as Continue.

This phase covers the time from entering a prompt to seeing a fully rendered, editable website preview. This is where the core AI technology operates.

Spawned Average: 18 seconds. The interface updates in real-time, showing sections as they are generated.

Continue Average: 32 seconds. The process involves waiting for a complete page build before the preview loads.

Why it matters: Faster iteration means developers can test more prompts and refine the output quickly.

Deployment to Live Site Latency

Spawned's integrated launchpad eliminates external deployment delays.

After customizing the preview, the site must be deployed to become publicly accessible. This step involves hosting and often blockchain transactions.

Spawned: Deployment is part of the token launch. Clicking 'Launch' triggers contract creation and site hosting simultaneously. Average time: ~45 seconds.

Continue: The AI builder creates static site files. You must then host them separately (e.g., Vercel, Fleek) and connect your own token contract. This adds a minimum of 2+ minutes for setup and deployment.

Key Difference: Spawned provides a single, automated deployment flow. Continue requires a multi-tool, manual process.

Complete Workflow: Token & Site Launch

For developers, the total time from idea to a live token with a website is the most important metric. Here is the step-by-step comparison.

Spawned's Integrated Workflow:

Prompt & Generate: Enter prompt, get site preview (18s).
Customize: Edit text, colors, images (user-dependent).
Launch: Enter token details (name, supply) and click launch. The platform handles contract minting, liquidity pool creation, and site deployment in one transaction (~45s).
Result: Live token and website. Total Average: ~1 minute (post-customization).

Continue's Fragmented Workflow:

Prompt & Generate: Enter prompt, wait for preview (32s).
Customize: Edit the generated site.
Deploy Site: Export code and deploy to a separate hosting service (2+ mins).
Launch Token: Use a separate launchpad (like pump.fun) to create the token contract (1+ min).
Connect: Manually update the website with the new contract address.
Result: Live token and website. Total Average: 3+ minutes (post-customization).

How Speed Affects Developer Projects

Saving minutes per launch has tangible effects on project development, testing, and iteration.

Rapid Prototyping: Spawned allows testing 3-4 token concepts with live sites in the time it takes to launch one on Continue.
Time to Market: In a fast-moving meme token market, launching minutes earlier can impact initial visibility and trading volume.
Lower Testing Cost: Faster cycles mean lower Solana transaction costs when iterating on Devnet or mainnet.
Focus: Less time spent on deployment logistics means more time for community building and marketing.

Speed Test Verdict & Recommendation

Choose Spawned for integrated speed; Continue for standalone site generation.

Based on our direct measurements, Spawned is significantly faster than Continue for launching a Solana token with a live website.

The speed advantage comes from Spawned's integrated design, which combines the AI website builder with the token launchpad. This eliminates the need to switch between tools, manually deploy sites, and synchronize contract addresses. For developers whose priority is speed, iteration, and a streamlined launch process, Spawned provides a distinct performance benefit.

Continue's AI builder, while functional, operates as a standalone tool. Its speed is constrained by its separation from the token launch process, requiring developers to manage a multi-step, multi-platform workflow that inherently adds latency.

Test the Speed Difference Yourself

The best way to understand the speed advantage is to experience it. Spawned offers a transparent, low-cost way to launch a complete token project.

Launch Fee: 0.1 SOL (~$20).
Included AI Builder: No monthly subscription (saves $29-99/mo vs. standalone services).
Creator Rewards: Earn 0.30% of every trade.
Holder Rewards: Set a 0.30% ongoing reward for token holders.

Launch your token with Spawned's AI Builder and see how quickly you can go from idea to live.

Start Building Free Explore Projects

Frequently Asked Questions

No. In our tests, both platforms generated websites with similar levels of polish, structure, and mobile responsiveness. Spawned's speed gain is primarily from engineering optimizations in its generation pipeline and the elimination of external deployment steps, not from reducing output quality.

Technically yes, but it negates the speed benefit. You would build the site on Continue (32s), deploy it to external hosting (2+ mins), launch the token on Spawned (~45s), and then manually update the site with the new contract address. Using Spawned's integrated builder is far more efficient.

The relative difference remains. While mainnet transaction times can vary with network congestion, Spawned's integrated single-transaction launch and Continue's multi-step manual process maintain a similar time ratio. The steps Continue requires (external hosting deployment, manual contract address updates) are not on the blockchain and thus aren't affected by mainnet congestion, but they still add fixed delays.

Continue could be marginally faster if you only need a static website preview and have no intention of immediately launching a token. However, for the complete task of launching a functional Solana token with a live site, Spawned's integrated system is faster end-to-end.

The speed allows for agile launches. Teams can finalize website copy and branding much closer to launch time. It also enables rapid re-launches or testing of variant tokenomics with new sites without a significant time penalty, which is useful for community-driven projects or testing different narratives.

Ready to get started?

Try Spawned free today

Start Building