Use Case

Solve Low Liquidity: Practical Techniques for Crypto Creators

Low liquidity creates volatility, slippage, and trust issues for new tokens. Solving this requires specific techniques from launch through ongoing management. This guide details proven methods to build and maintain healthy liquidity pools for Solana tokens, focusing on practical implementation.

Try It Now

Key Benefits

Initial liquidity of at least 5-10 SOL is critical for a stable launch and to prevent extreme price swings.
Implementing holder rewards, like Spawned's 0.30% ongoing rewards, directly incentivizes users to lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply.
Using bonding curves and graduated launchpads provides a liquidity runway, preventing the immediate 'rug pull' scenario common on basic platforms.
Strategic airdrops tied to holding periods can temporarily reduce sell pressure while building an engaged community.

The Problem

Traditional solutions are complex, time-consuming, and often require technical expertise.

The Solution

Spawned provides an AI-powered platform that makes building fast, simple, and accessible to everyone.

Why Low Liquidity Is a Critical Problem

Low liquidity isn't just a minor inconvenience—it's a primary reason new tokens fail.

When a token has insufficient liquidity, even small trades cause significant price impact. A buy order of just 1 SOL can spike the price by 20% or more, while a similar sell order crashes it. This volatility scares away serious investors and enables 'sniping' bots to manipulate the market. Furthermore, high slippage (often 10-30% on low-liquidity pools) makes trading impractical for regular users. The result is a token that can't be used for its intended purpose, whether that's community governance, in-game assets, or creator rewards. Solving this from day one establishes credibility and enables real utility.

For gaming tokens, this is especially crucial. Players need to buy and sell assets without losing a significant portion of their value to slippage. How to create a gaming token on Solana details the utility requirements that depend on stable liquidity.

Step-by-Step: Initial Liquidity Provision Techniques

1. Determine Your Minimum Viable Liquidity (MVL)

Before launch, calculate the MVL needed to support your expected initial trading volume. A good rule of thumb for a community token is 5-10 SOL as the starting pool. For a token with a pre-existing community or funding, aim for 20-50 SOL. This provides a buffer against initial volatility.

2. Choose the Right Launch Mechanism

Avoid simple 'create pair and add liquidity' on a DEX. Use a launchpad with built-in liquidity mechanisms:

  • Bonding Curves: Platforms like Spawned use bonding curves that gradually build liquidity as tokens are bought, creating a more stable price discovery phase.
  • Graduation Models: These require a token to reach specific liquidity and market cap milestones (e.g., 50 SOL liquidity) before moving to a full DEX, ensuring a minimum standard is met.

3. Fund the Pool Correctly

When adding liquidity, use a 50/50 ratio of SOL to your tokens at your target launch price. For example, for a launch price of 0.001 SOL per token, a 10 SOL pool would be paired with 10,000 tokens. Locking a portion of the initial liquidity (even symbolically) via a timelock contract builds immediate trust.

Compare these launch strategies in our guide on how to launch a gaming token on Solana.

Holder Incentives to Reduce Circulating Supply

The most effective way to solve ongoing low liquidity is to incentivize holding, which directly reduces sell-side pressure.

These techniques encourage users to lock tokens in their wallets instead of selling them into the liquidity pool.

  • Transaction Reward Redistribution: Direct a percentage of every trade to holders. For instance, Spawned's model provides 0.30% of every trade back to token holders as SOL rewards. This creates a direct financial incentive to hold.
  • Staking or Vesting Schedules: Offer additional token rewards for users who stake or lock their tokens for set periods (e.g., 30, 90, 180 days). This temporarily removes tokens from the circulating supply.
  • Tiered Access Models: Grant exclusive access to content, mint passes, or community channels based on token holding thresholds. This ties utility to holding.
  • Buyback and Burn Programs: Use a portion of project revenue (like the 0.30% creator fee) to periodically buy tokens from the market and burn them. This increases the scarcity and value of remaining tokens, supporting the price floor.

Launchpad Comparison: Liquidity Features

FeatureBasic DEX/Manual Poolpump.fun ModelSpawned Model
Initial LiquidityCreator must provide 100% upfront. High risk if underfunded.Bonding curve generates liquidity from buys. No initial pool required.Bonding curve + graduation to a 50+ SOL pool, ensuring a minimum standard.
Ongoing Liquidity IncentivesNone. Relies entirely on market forces.None. The 0% fee model provides no built-in rewards for holders.0.30% of every trade is distributed to token holders, directly incentivizing holding and reducing sell pressure.
Creator Funding for LiquidityNone.0% fee means no revenue to fund buybacks or liquidity adds.0.30% creator fee generates a treasury that can be used for strategic liquidity provision or buybacks.
Post-Launch Liquidity LockOptional, manual process.N/A (tokens graduate to Raydium).Integrated Token-2022 program can enforce a 1% perpetual fee to fund ongoing community and liquidity efforts.

The key difference is sustainable mechanics. While a bonding curve solves the initial liquidity problem, models with ongoing holder rewards like Spawned's 0.30% directly attack the continuous liquidity challenge by altering holder economics.

Advanced Techniques and Strategic Partnerships

Once initial liquidity is established, these advanced methods can deepen pools and improve stability.

  • Liquidity Pool (LP) Token Staking: Reward users who provide liquidity to the SOL/token pair on DEXs like Raydium or Orca with additional token emissions. This directly incentivizes adding to the pool.
  • Partnerships with Liquidity Providers: Work with professional market makers or DAOs that specialize in providing liquidity for a share of fees or token allocations. This is more common for larger projects.
  • Cross-Chain Liquidity Bridges: If expanding, use bridges to connect liquidity pools across chains (e.g., Solana to Ethereum). This taps into larger capital pools but adds complexity. See how to create a gaming token on Ethereum for chain-specific considerations.
  • Concentrated Liquidity: On DEXs that support it (like Orca Whirlpools), encourage LPs to provide liquidity within a specific price range (e.g., +/- 20% of current price). This makes capital more efficient and can support higher volume with less total SOL locked.

Verdict: The Most Effective Path to Solve Low Liquidity

For crypto creators, solving low liquidity requires a multi-phase approach that begins at launch and is sustained by tokenomics. The most effective technique is combining a graduated launchpad with built-in, ongoing holder incentives.

Start with a platform that uses a bonding curve to bootstrap initial liquidity and has a graduation threshold (e.g., 50 SOL) to ensure a minimum viable pool. This solves the day-one problem. Crucially, choose a model where the token's own economic design fights low liquidity continuously. A system that redistributes a portion of every trade (like 0.30%) to holders creates a powerful, built-in reason to hold rather than sell, directly reducing circulating supply and sell pressure on the pool. This is superior to a zero-fee model that provides no such sustaining mechanism.

Finally, use the treasury generated from a reasonable creator fee (again, 0.30%) to fund strategic buybacks, LP rewards, or partnerships to deepen liquidity over time. This creates a sustainable cycle rather than a one-time liquidity provision.

Ready to Launch with Built-In Liquidity Solutions?

Stop treating liquidity as an afterthought. Launch your Solana token on a platform designed to solve low liquidity from the start. Spawned provides the bonding curve launch, the graduation safety net, and, most importantly, the 0.30% ongoing holder rewards that incentivize holding and stabilize your pool. You also get an AI website builder to promote your token, saving on monthly costs.

Launch fee: 0.1 SOL (approx. $20). Start building a token with sustainable liquidity from day one.

Related Topics

Frequently Asked Questions

For a typical community or meme token, aim for an initial liquidity pool of at least 5-10 SOL. This provides a basic buffer against extreme volatility from small trades. For projects with pre-launch funding or a larger community, 20-50 SOL is a stronger starting point. Using a bonding curve launchpad can help you reach this level progressively rather than requiring the full amount upfront.

Holder rewards directly change user behavior. When token holders receive a share of trading fees (e.g., 0.30% of every transaction), they have a financial incentive to keep holding their tokens to continue earning SOL. This reduces the number of tokens being sold back into the liquidity pool, decreasing sell-side pressure. Less selling means the pool's SOL reserves are depleted more slowly, maintaining stability.

A standard liquidity pool on a DEX like Raydium starts with a fixed amount of SOL and tokens. A bonding curve is a smart contract that mints tokens dynamically as buyers send SOL to it, following a mathematical formula where price increases as the total supply minted grows. This gradually builds the liquidity pool from zero as people buy, providing initial price discovery and liquidity without the creator needing to fund a large pool upfront. Tokens typically 'graduate' to a standard pool once enough liquidity is accumulated.

Yes, you can always add more SOL and tokens to your liquidity pool on the DEX (like Raydium) post-launch. This is often done from a project's treasury. A more strategic approach is to use mechanisms that incentivize your community to provide liquidity, such as offering token rewards for users who stake their LP tokens. This decentralizes the responsibility and aligns incentives.

While a 0% trading fee seems attractive, it provides no built-in, sustainable revenue mechanism for the project or its holders. The project earns nothing to fund buybacks, marketing, or liquidity incentives. Crucially, holders earn no rewards, so the only incentive to hold is pure speculation. This often leads to faster 'pump and dump' cycles and weaker long-term liquidity, as there's no economic benefit to holding through volatility.

When you provide liquidity to a DEX pool, you receive LP (Liquidity Provider) tokens representing your share of that pool. Projects can encourage deeper liquidity by creating a staking program where users lock these LP tokens in exchange for additional token rewards. This directly incentivizes people to add more SOL and tokens to the trading pool, increasing its depth and stability. It's a key technique for growing liquidity after the initial launch phase.

It can, but it also fragments it. Launching a token on Solana and Ethereum, for example, creates two separate liquidity pools. While this accesses two different investor bases, it requires maintaining and incentivizing both pools. For most new creators, it's more effective to build deep, stable liquidity on one primary chain first (like Solana for its low fees and speed) before considering expansion. See our guides for [Ethereum](/use-cases/token/how-to-launch-gaming-token-on-ethereum) and [Base](/use-cases/token/how-to-create-gaming-token-on-base) for chain-specific factors.

Ready to get started?

Join thousands of users who are already building with Spawned. Start your project today - no credit card required.